LAURIE WEIR
Rideau Lakes Township finds itself embroiled in yet another round of Integrity Commissioner (IC) investigations, raising important questions: Are these probes now par for the course in township politics, or is something deeper going wrong? This time, Coun. Paula Banks—along with her husband, Coun. Jeff Banks, and Deputy Mayor Marci Maxwell—is under the microscope. Meanwhile, veteran Coun. Linda Carr’s previous investigation has been referred to the Ombudsman.
Why are so many councillors under scrutiny, and what does this say about the state of governance in Rideau Lakes?
Paula Banks, in particular, has been in the spotlight more than most, having already faced a prior investigation that led to a suspension of her pay earlier this year. Now, barely 16 months into her term, she’s again defending herself. Her frustration is clear—both in council meetings and on social media, where she recently vented about the strain of defending herself, having to submit 56 pages of evidence to counter what she feels are false accusations.
But here’s where some concerns arise. While Banks’ frustration is understandable, her public responses often seem centred on her individual experience. Whether addressing council or communicating online, she tends to focus on how the situation affects her rather than framing it as part of a larger issue that affects the council. It’s not uncommon for political figures to defend their reputation, but in Banks’ case, there’s an overemphasis on the personal—”I” instead of “we.” This individual focus can sometimes make it harder to build unity within the council or to effectively address the deeper challenges Rideau Lakes is facing.
That said, it’s important to acknowledge that being the subject of multiple investigations can be exhausting and demoralizing for any councillor, especially when they believe the complaints are unwarranted. Banks has raised valid concerns about the toll these investigations take—not just on her but on the township as a whole, particularly in terms of taxpayer dollars spent and the time consumed by these processes. Her point that “drama” in the council is getting out of hand is something worth reflecting on. If these investigations are becoming a distraction from the real work of governing, then perhaps a deeper look at how complaints are handled is in order.
The reality is that the integrity of the council—and the effectiveness of its members—depends on trust and collaboration. While investigations are essential for accountability, there’s a fine line between holding people accountable and fostering an environment where accusations and counter-accusations dominate. Banks has expressed that she feels unfairly targeted, and that’s something to take seriously. However, if she—and the rest of the council—can shift the focus from personal grievances to collective solutions, it could help Rideau Lakes move beyond this current cycle of investigations and into a more productive future.
Leadership requires both defending oneself and working toward the greater good. Banks has shown that she’s willing to stand up for herself, which is important, but leadership also requires fostering a sense of unity and shared purpose. If the council can shift to a more team approach there’s an opportunity to rebuild trust and address the issues facing Rideau Lakes more collaboratively.
The frequent investigations raise questions about the conduct of individual councillors and the broader system at play. Are these probes justified, or have they become tools of political maneuvering? Either way, the result is the same: a council caught in the crosshairs of internal conflict rather than focused on serving the community.
The people of Rideau Lakes deserve a council that works together to address their needs, and that’s going to require all councillors to look beyond personal grievances and focus on the bigger picture. It’s time to move past the drama and start building a more unified council, one that puts the township and its residents first.
